This is a sketch of everything. It has been proposed by many scientists that the shape of the planet is not a sphere or spheroid. That it is actually toroidal, as the magnetic field that the world generates is a toroid shape. All processes or cycles on the planet exist in a flow that follows a toroid shape. Here is a quick sketch of just the planet: 

 

Of course this is just the magnetic field. Science currently calls this the magnetosphere. Scientists skipped the work of introducing active toroidal models to a scientific community dominated by static spherical models, and simply called the earth's toroid shaped magnetic field a "magneto" "sphere" and killed all statement accuracy on the subject for the era.

A quick sketch of the Earth and the field: 

 

There were a couple pictures that came from Voyager last month that showed tiny little magnetic fields.

Nasa called them "magnetic bubbles" furthering the misconception of magnetic fields as spheres and implying they are subject to surface tension.That charachterization made me wonder how on Earth NASA could have invented an ion drive if they dont even know how to accurately represent a magnetic field.

I decided that science pr was probably to blame and moved on to the data:

After re-visioning the heliosheath in my mind I realized that the Sun was a vector field of toroid waveform oscillation. The artifacts at the edge of the heliosheath are not from our sun, but rather, they are the interstellar ether, collected at the bow shock, pushed into toroidal form, by a giant toroidal waveform oscillation that they are riding around the galaxy. A glimpse of the field between energy and what we perceive of as matter.

I began to consider it without time as a constant and visualized everything that ever existed and ever would exist existing simutlaneously. As a vector field of toroidal field oscillations, no moment would ever be the same as any other moment as they are all in what we perceive as motion. Oscillating at different frequencies, without the concept of a moving event horizon that we call "time" they are simply occupying their particular location in spacetime.

From that perspective I examined the concept of "big bang" and dropped it entirely as it was not possible for nothing to be. <-that's proper english, just an uncommon statement. It is not possible for any waveform oscillation to have no relative earlier waveform. Just as one block stacks up on another and no block is at the bottom sitting on nothing, so the existence of the universe in spacetime follows the same pattern. With every oscillation of the field a descendant of the oscillation of the field. I decided to visualize the sun again and when I saw it, it was beautiful, all of human history, our tiny little moment, on this beautiful mass of water and earth stretching out around the sun. It looked so whole. Like a single one drop of water on the sun, a swirling shape in eventless spacetime.

The piece titled "The History of All Earth Ever, As A Drop of Water on The Sun" I admit is a pale representation of what I see in my imagination when I conceptualize the Earth's relationship with the Sun, but it is as accurate as we know today. In time I will hopefully be able to prove that it is the more beautiful and accurate perspective for depicting our home in the universe, more capable of describing the peace of it and communicating an understanding of it than the portrayals of our home as one of a bunch of mysteriously connected sphere bubles floating in the blackness of nothing after a mysterious bang.